The New Mexico Environmental Law Center has filed its brief in a challenge of the state’s Copper Rule, which oversees the handling of mining wastes.
The center’s brief argues that the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission (WQCC) violated the state’s Water Quality Act when it adopted the Copper Rule, and asks the Court of Appeals to set the rule aside. Albuquerque Business First
04/14/2014 • Back to top
On April 9, 2014, the NMELC filed a Reply Brief with the state’s Court of Appeals for clients Southwest Energy Efficiency Project, Sundancer Creations Custom Builders, Environment New Mexico, e-Solved, Inc., and individuals.
This marks the final bit of briefing in the appeal over the repeal of building codes by the New Mexico Construction Industries Commission. The codes would have required new construction to be 20% more energy efficient than was required previously. The Court might take up to nine months to decide on the matter.
Visit Repeal of Energy Efficient Building Codes case page.
04/11/2014 • Back to top
SANTA FE, N.M.— The New Mexico Environmental Law Center (NMELC) filed its Brief in Chief yesterday in an appeal against the adoption of the Copper Rule - a rule that regulates discharges from copper mines. The brief argues that the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission (WQCC) violated the state’s Water Quality Act when it adopted the Copper Rule, and asks the Court of Appeals to set the rule aside.
“This rule, on its face, allows toxic pollution into groundwater,” says Bruce Frederick, NMELC Staff Attorney. “Given that sixty-five percent of our state is currently in severe drought or worse – including Grant County where Freeport McMoRan’s massive copper mines are located – our decision-makers should be developing rules that protect groundwater. The law is clear in New Mexico: water is a public resource, and it must be protected.”
04/10/2014 • Back to top
By Douglas Meiklejohn / Executive Director, New Mexico Environmental Law Center
Printed in the Albuquerque Journal on March 27, 2014
Groundwater provides the drinking water for 90 percent of the people in New Mexico. For that reason, whether the recently adopted regulation that addresses groundwater pollution by copper mines (commonly referred to as “the Copper Rule”) adequately protects New Mexico’s groundwater is a very significant issue.
Officials of the New Mexico Environment Department, including its new Secretary, Ryan Flynn, have attempted to defend the Copper Rule by asserting that it is the most protective regulation in the country.
That assertion is not accurate.
04/02/2014 • Back to top
The slightly shabby Santa Fe office of the New Mexico Environmental Law Center doesn’t look like it houses a formidable legal force. But it does. “The Law Center is the most important environmental organization in New Mexico today,” says Antonio Luján, a former state representative. “It has credibility with the Legislature, credibility with communities, and it takes on the right issues.” Green Fire Times
04/02/2014 • Back to top
Citizens’ Coalition Statement on Postponement of Hearing on Dairy Groundwater Protections and Lack of Enforcement by NMED
In a statement released on March 18, 2014, a coalition of New Mexicans who live near industrial dairies and public-interest groups released the following statement:
Following New Mexico’s adoption of the polluting Copper Rule, the dairy industry was quick to jump at the chance for similar favorable treatment. In 2013, it petitioned the State to gut the recently enacted Dairy Rule after less than a year of implementation. Meanwhile, the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) has suspended enforcement of the Dairy Rule and issuance of dairy pollution-control permits until after the rulemaking hearing.
03/18/2014 • Back to top