The New Mexico Environmental Law Center, which represents GRIP in the case, is waiting as patiently as it can on the ruling as well and hasn’t heard a peep.
“The Supreme Court will announce its opinion when it announces its opinion,” said Law Center Executive Director Doug Meiklejohn. “We don’t get any advance warning and there isn’t any deadline by which they must issue their opinion.” Silver City Daily Press
Read Silver City Daily Press for full story.
11/17/2016 • Back to top
On November 17th, the Con Alma Health Foundation will recognize Douglas Meiklejohn, Executive Director and Founder of the Law Center, as one of its two “Heroes of Health” in 2016.
Doug is humbled by the award, noting that, “This award is special because it recognizes that the health and wellbeing of all New Mexicans depend on equal access to clean air, water and land.”
Under his direction, NMELC has advocated for communities and the environment on hundreds of issues, demonstrating through its many successes that communities can band together to fight polluters and greatly reduce the health threats they pose.
11/16/2016 • Back to top
Reflections from Chris Shuey of the Southwest Research and Information Center (SRIC).
SRIC was aware that Uranium Resources, Inc. had filed an application for a “radioactive source materials license” with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and a groundwater discharge plan with the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) as far back as 1987 because two executives brought applications to SRIC, thinking we would be impressed with their proposal.
11/15/2016 • Back to top
Recently, it was quietly announced that Ryan Flynn, who quit his position as state environment secretary in August, would be heading the New Mexico Oil and Gas Association. Gov. Susana Martinez appointed Flynn — then a tax lawyer — as New Mexico Environment Department general counsel in 2011 and elevated him to secretary in 2013…Gov. Susana Martinez has said that she is proud of her environmental record with Flynn at the helm, but their approach has been only to protect polluters and sue the EPA. Santa Fe New Mexican
Go to Santa Fe New Mexican for full story
11/05/2016 • Back to top
On October 17, NMELC and the Multicultural Alliance for a Safe Environment (MASE) submitted comments highly critical of proposed changes to New Mexico Groundwater and Surface Water Quality regulations.
“The proposed changes would potentially allow increased contamination of ground water throughout the state, possibly in perpetuity, and would eliminate the Water Quality Act’s (“WQA” or “Act”) public notice and participation requirements in the permitting process,”
penned Staff Attorney Jaimie Park in response to the New Mexico Environment Department’s (NMED’s) second round of draft regulations. Check out all of NMED’s attempts to weaken public participation and relax standards (including barium, chromium, xylenes and vinyl chloride) in our comments: 161017_NMELC_MASE_2nd_comments_NMED_water_reg_amendments.pdf
The comment period on these proposed changes ends today (October 17) at 5pm. We anticipate that NMED will petition the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission to consider these amendments in 2017. We will keep you posted.
10/17/2016 • Back to top
New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) is in the process of revising statewide surface water and groundwater regulations for the state - October 17 marks the deadline for the round of public comments on a second draft. This draft failed to address any of the substantive concerns voiced during the first comment period by NMELC, concerned citizens, or other water-protection groups around the state. We’ve flagged some significant problems with how the Martinez Administration is trying to strip provisions for public participation and streamline the permitting process for polluters.
Deadline: 5pm MDT, Monday, October 17
Read NMED’s proposed changes here: https://www.env.nm.gov/gwb/
Read NMED’s “Hit List” for regulation changes.
Staff Attorney Jaimie Park is heading NMELC’s effort to submit a second round of comments on Monday. You can read our comments on the last draft here (our concerns remain in this draft); find out more, including aa good synopsis of the issues and a sample letter, at the website of our client and ally, Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety. Thank you!
10/14/2016 • Back to top